As AI continues to reshape society, revisiting the foundations of computing offers valuable perspective on today’s technological and ethical challenges. Drawing on discussions within IFIP Working Group 9.2, this article explores how many of Alan Turing’s early ideas continue to resonate nearly 80 years after they were first proposed.

During the Alan Turing Centenary in 2012, a collection of newspaper articles from the 1940s and 1950s offered a fascinating glimpse into how the public first encountered the idea of electronic computing. Headlines such as Britain to Make a Radio Brain (1946) and Brains Backseated (1950) reflected both the excitement and uncertainty surrounding technologies that would eventually transform society.

Turing himself anticipated many of the challenges that remain central to AI today. In his 1945 proposal for the National Physical Laboratory’s Automatic Computing Engine (ACE), he observed that an intelligent machine might occasionally make serious mistakes. His insight has renewed relevance in the era of generative AI, where systems can produce convincing but inaccurate information, often described as hallucinations. These questions of reliability, trust and human judgement continue to engage researchers across the IFIP community.

Speaking in 1946, Sir Charles Galton Darwin, Director of the National Physical Laboratory, described Turing’s vision of the Automatic Computing Engine, suggesting that machines could eventually perform tasks that relied on what people regarded as “rule of thumb” reasoning. At a time when electronic computing was still in its infancy, these ideas challenged conventional thinking about the future relationship between humans and machines.

Turing continued to explore these themes in a series of BBC radio broadcasts during the early 1950s. In one lecture, Can Digital Computers Think?, he reflected on the immense challenge of programming intelligence, comparing it to describing family life on a distant planet that was known to exist but had never been observed directly.

Among Turing’s more unusual interests was his willingness to consider whether telepathy might influence experiments designed to distinguish humans from machines. Although speculative, this line of thinking led him to argue that participants in what later became known as the Turing Test should be physically separated and communicate only through written text. This ensured that any judgement was based solely on conversation rather than other forms of human interaction.

Although the ACE processed digital electrical pulses rather than radio signals, its memory technology drew directly on wartime radar research through the use of mercury delay lines. Turing’s wartime work also extended beyond codebreaking. Alongside his contribution to breaking the Lorenz cipher, he participated in the development of Delilah, a secure voice-scrambling radio system, illustrating the close relationship between early computing, communications and cryptography.

Today, advances in edge computing and low-power AI hardware once again blur the boundaries between computing and communications. Modern devices increasingly employ neural-inspired processing techniques to analyse and interpret signals efficiently, demonstrating how concepts that emerged during the earliest years of computing continue to influence contemporary research.

For the IFIP community, revisiting Turing’s work is more than an exercise in computing history. His reflections on intelligence, human judgement, communication and the responsible use of technology continue to inform contemporary debates about AI, trust, ethics and the future relationship between people and machines. As IFIP’s Technical Committees and Working Groups explore these challenges from multiple disciplinary perspectives, Turing’s ideas remain a powerful reminder that many of today’s questions have deep historical roots, even if the technologies have evolved beyond anything he could have imagined.