Not long ago, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives were a top priority for leading software companies. However, in a short period, a wave of backlash has led many firms to reassess their DEI strategies. Once viewed as essential for innovation and fairness, DEI programs are now under scrutiny, and some are even being scaled back or quietly shelved. Responding to this DEI backlash is crucial in academic research, especially because, currently, little scholarly work has been done to understand its causes, consequences, and possible responses. As the corporate world reevaluates its commitment to diversity, academia and research communities have a vital role to play in keeping inclusion efforts alive and thriving.
One wonderful example of proactive and impactful work in this area is the EUGAIN network (European Network For Gender Balance in Informatics). Founded under the COST Action framework, EUGAIN has been tirelessly working to address gender imbalances in computer science and informatics across Europe. While headlines might suggest that efforts toward diversity are faltering, EUGAIN’s achievements tell a different, far more hopeful story.
Over the past few years, EUGAIN has built a vibrant and growing community that spans over 40 countries. By connecting researchers, educators, and policymakers, the network has created an infrastructure for sustained action toward gender balance. It has organized countless workshops, training sessions, and networking events designed to empower women and underrepresented groups in computer science. These initiatives not only raise awareness but also build tangible skills and networks that participants can leverage throughout their careers.
Beyond its events, EUGAIN has been instrumental in producing important reports and guidelines that inform national and European policy. By gathering data and best practices, EUGAIN offers concrete tools that universities and research institutions can adopt to foster more inclusive environments. In an era where some organizations are stepping back from public DEI commitments, this work is crucial for maintaining progress within the academic world.
Moreover, EUGAIN’s emphasis on community and mentorship cannot be overstated. One of the persistent challenges in promoting diversity is the feeling of isolation experienced by underrepresented individuals. Through mentorship programs and cross-country collaborations, EUGAIN provides much-needed support systems, helping young scholars navigate academic and professional challenges with greater confidence.
As we face this moment of uncertainty in the broader DEI landscape, the work of networks like EUGAIN reminds us why sustained, collective efforts are essential. DEI is not just a corporate initiative; it is a commitment to building a more just, innovative, and dynamic world. In academia, where the next generation of scientists and engineers is shaped, the responsibility is even greater.
Now, we must invest on research, advocacy, and community-building. EUGAIN’s achievements demonstrate that meaningful progress is possible when we work together across borders, disciplines, and institutions. While the corporate world may be rethinking its strategies, in the world of academia and research, the message is clear: diversity, equity, and inclusion are not passing trends—they are foundational values that deserve our unwavering support.
Letizia Jaccheri has been very active within IFIP, acting as Vice-Chair of IFIP TC14 (Technical Committee on Entertainment Computing), publishing several papers at IFIP conferences, and helping organize IFIP events. She was general chair of the ICEC (International Conference on Entertainment Computing) held in Norway in 2015. Her work at IFIP has often focused on the intersection of technology, creativity, education, and social impact, reflecting her broader research interests.
For more information, visit www.eugain.eu
